The
Dallas Morning News,
Austin American-Statesman, and
Victoria Advocate have all picked up a story about Ron Paul's hypocrisy in fighting for earmarks in approproations bills, then voting against the bills on final passage.
The article, by Suzanne Gamboa of the Associated Press, notes that Paul has requested over 50 earmarks for his district, including "$8.6 million for the Army Corps of Engineers to maintain the Texas City Channel and $10 million for the Galveston Rail Causeway Bridge. He also asked for money for a nursing program, expansion of a cancer center at Brazosport Hospital, a seafood testing program, a Children's Identification and Location Database and $8 million for Wild American Shrimp Marketing requested by the Texas Shrimp Association."
If past performance indicates future actions, Paul will fight to get those earmarks into the budget, then vote against the total document. Knowing that the vote to pass the budget will be overwhelming, he's in the best of both worlds: he can fight for all the pork he wants, sanctimoniously vote against the budget, then tell his colleagues, constituents, and citizens how he's voted against Bog Government Spending.
Paul's aide Tom Lizardo (I am not making that name up) defends Paul's speaking with forked tongue, saying "he feels the IRS takes the money and so it's (his) job to make sure money comes back in the district." Riiiiiiiight.
Political posturing and hypocrisy are nothing new, but Paul's hypocrisy points up the deeper problem with Libertarianism: it just doesn't work. You cannot live in the United States of America without paying the piper. We live in a complex, integrated, globalized society. In that environment, government plays a critical role -- not just in the "soft" health and human services issues, but in the coordination of basic institutions like transportation, public safety, finance, commerce, and education.
Libertarians are, I think, right about some things. I believe government should stay out of people's personal lives, for instance. Also, having watched George Bush and Rick Perry in action the last few years, I tend to agree with Thomas Paine that "that government is best that governs least." But Paul's knee-jerk libertarianism is, at its core, irresponsible.